The Adam Skelly BBQ Case Returns to Court: Why This Hearing Matters and How You Can Support It
A landmark court battle over lockdowns, civil liberties, and the future of constitutional rights in Canada
Adam Skelly’s heroic defiance at Adamson BBQ ignited a police siege and an epic legal battle against Canada’s COVID-era tyranny. His February 25 to 27 hearing now stands as one of the last major tests for justice, accountability, and the restoration of fundamental freedoms.
In 2021, at the height of pandemic restrictions, Skelly, owner of Adamson Barbecue in Toronto, made a choice that would change his life. Rather than comply with government orders that forced small businesses to close while large corporations remained open, he chose to serve customers in defiance of what he believed were unjust and unconstitutional mandates.
The response was swift and overwhelming. Police shut down his restaurant, erected fencing, and placed the business under surveillance. Skelly was arrested, charged, and subjected to years of legal pressure. What began as a dispute over public health rules quickly became a national symbol of resistance to government overreach.
For many Canadians, Adamson BBQ represented more than a restaurant. It became a rallying point for those who believed that emergency powers were being abused, livelihoods were being destroyed, and civil liberties were being ignored.
Now, after years of delays and legal maneuvering, the case is finally reaching a critical stage in Ontario Superior Court from February 25 to 27.
A Case with National Implications
The Adamson BBQ hearings are not just about one business owner. They raise serious questions about:
The limits of government authority during emergencies
The use of police power against peaceful citizens
The right to earn a living
Freedom of association and movement
The proportionality of public health enforcement
Legal documents and analysis published by Canuck Law outline how Skelly’s case touches on Charter rights and due process concerns that affected millions of Canadians during the pandemic.
If courts uphold the most aggressive enforcement actions taken against him, it risks setting a precedent that normalizes extreme state intervention in future crises. If, on the other hand, the court recognizes the disproportionate nature of the response, it may help restore confidence in constitutional protections.
This is why many observers see these hearings as a potential turning point.
Years of Pressure, One Ongoing Fight
Since 2021, Skelly has faced mounting legal costs, business losses, and personal strain. Despite this, he has remained committed to seeing the case through.
His persistence has been supported by thousands of Canadians who donated, shared information, and attended rallies. The fundraising page at GiveSendGo has served as a central hub for legal updates, documents, and financial support.
This sustained public backing reflects a deeper truth: many people saw their own experiences mirrored in his story. Small business owners, healthcare workers, families, and students all lived through restrictions that reshaped daily life with little democratic debate.
Adam Skelly personified these injustices as a Canadian blue-collar worker, husband, and father.
Public Support and Ongoing Coverage
Several independent journalists and commentators have followed the case closely, including Derek Sloan, who has interviewed Skelly and provided regular updates. In a recent discussion with Chris Weisdorf, Sloan revisited the broader implications of the legal battle and the lessons learned since 2021.
These conversations highlight how the Adamson BBQ case fits into a larger pattern of pandemic-era governance that is now being reassessed around the world.
As public inquiries, data releases, and court challenges continue to emerge, the narrative surrounding COVID policies is changing. What was once dismissed as fringe criticism is increasingly being taken seriously.
How to Follow and Support the Case
A video interview connected to this post is embedded above. It offers important context and firsthand insight into the ongoing struggle.
To donate and learn more, visit:
www.GiveSendGo.com/bbq_rebellion
This page contains background materials, court documents, and updates from Skelly’s legal team and supporters.
Attending the February Hearings
The hearings will take place in Toronto on February 25, 26, and 27.
At the time of writing, detailed information about in-person attendance and possible online access has not yet been released. Updates are expected closer to the date.
For the latest information, monitor:
Derek Sloan’s posts and updates on social media (link)
The GiveSendGo campaign page (link)
The Canuck Law website (canucklaw.ca)
Ontario Superior Court hearings are generally open to the public, but courtroom locations and virtual access details are typically confirmed shortly before proceedings begin.





Patrick King vs The Crown. Patrick King was issued a social distancing ticket which he fought in court. Mr King won. Mr King wanted The Crown/Canada to prove the mythological virus known as COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 existed by means of extracting the proof/virus from an infected patient. Canada could not do that because the virus is a myth. Thus Mr King won his case.
A "case-count" pandemic when no validated test existed. How can a case count be proven without a validated test? A validated test for a virus requires the Gold Standard, the alleged virus itself. And today, looks at calendar, 6-years after the lies, guess what? There is still not a validated test.
It's a wonder that the thousands of small business owners who were abused by being forced to close haven't united to sue the government. It was obvious to those of us who were/are awake that something was 'off' when large chain stores and liquor outlets were allowed to remain open, but private entities were forced to close. Then there was the issue of being told that we could get covid from using money, seriously? C'mon! Those two instances were purposefully designed to a) wipe out business owners b) get everyone used to using debt/credit cards without their knowing that all purchases have always been tracked, but this further cemented how easily citizen's could submit thus it is leading into the Digital ID'S-CBDC Social Credit Score system the WEF GLOBALISTS UN EU want in their efforts to attain worldwide control of societies. These organizations plan to continue to unleash whatever weird mechanisms they can, be it a plandemic or holographic schemes of UFO landings or Christ's appearance either one designed to terrorize citizen's into further submission of any and all rights under the guise of safety and obedience.