Unrepentant CPSO Revokes Dr Trozzi's License

CPSO revokes doctors’ licenses in Ontario for maintaining scientific and ethical integrity.

The recent news of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario under the leadership of registrar Dr Nancy Whitmore, revoking my license to practice in Ontario, requires some response.

There is a long line of the best doctors in Ontario: rare doctors who do not have covid-19 blood on our hands; who are having our licenses unlawfully revoked by a medical licensing body that has gone rogue, is off mission, and in my opinion, is guilty of crimes against humanity, assault, and murder in my province.

I am in my hometown Bancroft at the time of this writing. Here I am attending to the crisis of deaths, injuries, and turbo-cancers resulting from the fraudulent coerced experimental and contaminated covid-19 genetic injections, that the CPSO and others continue to misrepresent as “safe and effective vaccines”. This is modern war. I have consoled the mourning  parents of children who were killed by these injections in my arms. Those are the worst of many casualties.

I must find time to share more about the CPSO situation soon, but I can not let it distract me from my mission to help the injured and stop these crimes and murders everywhere.

Nancy Whitmore and the other leaders at the CPSO are minor villains in this story; nothing more. Guilty as hell and pathetic, but still minor characters whose tombstones will be small and forgotten.

Here Canada’s excellent Constitutional Lawyer Michael Alexander and I, joined Glen Jung of Bright Light News on November 14^th to discuss the CPSO Penalty Hearing, prior to this week’s final declaration of non-repentance from Dr Whitmore and her team at the CPSO.

Follow Bright Light News (Website, Twitter/X)

---

Please subscribe to support our mission. We operate on a tight budget and would not be able to continue without our audience´s support. Please also take advantage of our extensive free library of information that can save you and your family’s lives. If you would like to make a donation towards our cause, please click here.

---

January 25^th, 2024 Press Release By Attorney:

---

LITIGATIONWORKS

PRESS RELEASE

Toronto, January 25, 2024

DR. TROZZI TO APPEAL AFTER COLLEGE REVOKES HIS LICENCE

The Ontario Physicians and Surgeons Discipline Tribunal issued a penalty decision today revoking Dr. Mark's Trozzi's medical licence after ruling in October that he had committed acts of professional misconduct by spreading misinformation about Covid-19 science and making statements critical of Covid-19 public health policies and recommendations. Through his counsel, Michael Alexander, Dr. Trozzi announced today that he will exercise his statutory right to appeal the decision to the Ontario Divisional Court.

In reaching its decision, the Tribunal rejected Supreme Court cases, dating from 1939, which hold that Canadians enjoy an absolute constitutional right to express minority opinions on any subject. This allowed the Tribunal to rule that the College has a right to regulate the expression of its members in the name of the public interest.

The Tribunal's ruling also rested on the prior discipline hearing decision, where the Tribunal found that Dr. Trozzi had caused harm by spreading misinformation, even though expert witnesses for the College failed to tender evidence that Dr. Trozzi's statements had caused harm to a patient or a member of the public.

In support of its ruling, the Tribunal also rejected a 41-page report Dr. Trozzi submitted in 2021 in which he defended himself against the College's initial allegations, citing 29 references from mainstream sources such as Lancet, the New England Journal of Medicine, Public Health Ontario and Statistics Canada. This was done without mentioning that the College's main expert witness, Dr. Andrew Gardam, had admitted on cross-examination during the discipline hearing that he had never attempted to refute the Trozzi report.

When the pandemic was on the horizon in 2020, Dr. Trozzi, a university professor and 25-year ER veteran, played a leading role in preparing his own ER facility to deal with Covid patients. However, while the press was reporting in late 2020 that ER rooms were overwhelmed, Dr. Trozzi's ER room was virtually empty. Wondering how this could be, Dr. Trozzi called colleagues around Canada and the U.S. to inquire about their experiences and learned that their ER rooms were empty too.

As a result, Dr. Trozzi began to study Covid-19 science rigorously and soon discovered the government's narrative regarding the virus was deeply flawed. He then quit his job and devoted himself full-time to exploring the truth about all things Covid on a dedicated site,

 https://drtrozzi.org

. When a scientist friendly to the government's narrative alerted the College of Physicians to the site and Dr. Trozzi's heretical views, the College launched an investigation that resulted in his prosecution for professional misconduct.

Alexander commented: "Since Dr. Trozzi's right to appeal to the Divisional Court is based on a statute, the Court will be required to employ the highest standard of review on all legal issues, and that standard is correctness. In other words, the Court will have to determine whether the Tribunal got the right answer on every key legal issue; and where it does not, the Court will be required to correct the Tribunal's reasoning. The College has never had to face a fundamental challenge to its authority on this basis."

He added: "On correctness review, it will be very hard for the College to justify its initial decision to investigate Dr. Trozzi. Under the legislation, the College must have reasonable and probable grounds, which is the criminal standard, for believing that a member has committed an offence before it can launch an investigation. However, in its orders, the College did not describe any evidence to support the probable belief that Dr. Trozzi had done something wrong, and even failed to cite a specific offence. The appeal should succeed on this point alone."

Finally: "The Court of Appeal's recent decision to refuse to hear Jordan Peterson's case does not mean, as some have speculated, that freedom of expression is dead in Ontario. The Peterson case turned on the issue of whether the College of Psychologists could regulate the form of Dr. Peterson's expression, not its content. In Trozzi, the Divisional Court must decide whether to recognize the right of every citizen to express an alternative opinion, even if it offends censorious bureaucrats."  

For media inquiries, please contact Michael Alexander by cell at 416-318-4512 and by e-mail at malexanderjd@protonmail.com.

---

More information about the CPSO

• July 30, 2021: Dr Trozzi Speaks out on CPSO complaints against him

• June 15, 2022: Ontario Protest Against the Corruption & Abuse of the CPSO

• June 27, 2022: Ontario Protest Against the CPSO | Toronto

• September 2, 2022: CPSO creating and “solving” the doctor shortage

• October 27, 2022: CPSO “Vaccine” Exemptions and Trypanophobia

• November 21, 2022: ONTARIO DOCTORS TO RAISE CHARTER CLAIMS AGAINST CPSO

• November 24, 2022: Ethical MDs vs CPSO | What´s at stake?

• November 29, 2022: Iron Will Report: Crimes of the CPSO

• December 10, 2022: CPSO Lawlessness in Ontario

• May 10, 2023: Solidarity with CPSO Victims

• June 9, 2023: Dr Trozzi versus CPSO | The next steps in the fight

• June 13, 2023: CPSO v. Trozzi spectacle begins today

• June 18, 2023: Edward Dowd, Doctors McCullough, Phillips, Trozzi & the CPSO

• November 6, 2023: CPSO Pronounces Judgment Over Dr Trozzi

• December 5, 2023: CPSO & “The Agenda” vs Trozzi | Science and Human Rights