Stay informed with the latest emerging scientific discoveries on the dangers of COVID-19 genetic injections, brought to you by the world’s most trustworthy experts.
Thank you Dr. Trozzi for this valuable contribution. I'm confused. As I understand it now, there are two kinds of genetic damage being dispensed right now. There is of genetic damage with consequent manifestation of diseases that comes from random DNA in the vials for injection. And then there is the genetic damage done through the calculated injection of mRNA/lipid nanoparticle shots that are following the COVID bioweapon model.
As I understand it, the lie is told that COVID-19 procedures were such a great success that the same model can be used in the generation of new types of gene modifying injections for everything including the turbo cancers caused by the clot shots. Am I perceiving this dichotomy correctly-- accidental versus deliberation gene modification? What is the larger and more systemic danger? Can there really be said to be such a thing as "gene therapy" or is this a propaganda term?
Thanks Anthony. Though the label was "vaccine" the ingredients were genetic. The modified RNA was a predictably destructive genetic experiment with no benefit. The modified form of the mRNA made it more dangerous in terms of ribsome frame shifting which results in random proteins in addition to the toxic spike protein. All these other proteins and pieces of proteins have the capacity to produce a wide variety of other autoimmune diseases. The reverse transcription of the modRNA in the injections into DNA is a very real risk of foreign DNA production and possibly negative chromosome changes. However, the completely undeclared DNA especially with the Pfizer SV40 promoter sequence presents an even much bigger threat of genetically modifying the victims, and their off-spring if they can still have any. Nasty stuff really.
That clarifies a lot. So the random DNA in the vials will do totally random genetic modification. Am I close to the mark with this SOS alert with special reference to the situation in Alberta?
The DNA in the vials along with the SV40 promoter sequence , as well as reverse transcription from the modified mRNA threaten changes to the victims chromosomes.
The ribosome frame shifting when reading the modified mRNA in the shots renders the random spectrum of proteins and polypeptides that present risk for many autoimmune diseases.
The spike proteins created when the mod mRNA is read correctly by the ribosomes, create the quasi-auto immune attack on the victims' tissues and organs (this is the one we speak of the most).
The spike protein has many toxic effects which includes, to our surprise, the ability to enter the cell nucleus and cause further damage to the victims' chromosomes.
It is a complex bioweapon: a cellular "bull in a china shop".
Thanks Henry. There are so many causes needing our support. To support the WCH directly both subscribing to Tess's substack and donating directly on the www.worldcouncilforhealth.org web site work equally well. Thanks for helping to fund the fight Henry! It is David verses Goliath.
I'd love to see Dr. Mike Yeadon in these meetings. But of course, they would censor him (which others already have) because he goes beyond (ie. speaks the truth) what all of these people are saying.
Excellent up to to date info to pass on to those who aren't aware. Thanks, Dr Trozzi.
Thank you Dr. Trozzi for this valuable contribution. I'm confused. As I understand it now, there are two kinds of genetic damage being dispensed right now. There is of genetic damage with consequent manifestation of diseases that comes from random DNA in the vials for injection. And then there is the genetic damage done through the calculated injection of mRNA/lipid nanoparticle shots that are following the COVID bioweapon model.
As I understand it, the lie is told that COVID-19 procedures were such a great success that the same model can be used in the generation of new types of gene modifying injections for everything including the turbo cancers caused by the clot shots. Am I perceiving this dichotomy correctly-- accidental versus deliberation gene modification? What is the larger and more systemic danger? Can there really be said to be such a thing as "gene therapy" or is this a propaganda term?
Thanks Anthony. Though the label was "vaccine" the ingredients were genetic. The modified RNA was a predictably destructive genetic experiment with no benefit. The modified form of the mRNA made it more dangerous in terms of ribsome frame shifting which results in random proteins in addition to the toxic spike protein. All these other proteins and pieces of proteins have the capacity to produce a wide variety of other autoimmune diseases. The reverse transcription of the modRNA in the injections into DNA is a very real risk of foreign DNA production and possibly negative chromosome changes. However, the completely undeclared DNA especially with the Pfizer SV40 promoter sequence presents an even much bigger threat of genetically modifying the victims, and their off-spring if they can still have any. Nasty stuff really.
That clarifies a lot. So the random DNA in the vials will do totally random genetic modification. Am I close to the mark with this SOS alert with special reference to the situation in Alberta?
https://anthonyjhall.substack.com/p/from-cov-19-to-synthetic-design-forcing
The DNA in the vials along with the SV40 promoter sequence , as well as reverse transcription from the modified mRNA threaten changes to the victims chromosomes.
The ribosome frame shifting when reading the modified mRNA in the shots renders the random spectrum of proteins and polypeptides that present risk for many autoimmune diseases.
The spike proteins created when the mod mRNA is read correctly by the ribosomes, create the quasi-auto immune attack on the victims' tissues and organs (this is the one we speak of the most).
The spike protein has many toxic effects which includes, to our surprise, the ability to enter the cell nucleus and cause further damage to the victims' chromosomes.
It is a complex bioweapon: a cellular "bull in a china shop".
Is there an optimum way to donate, presently I subscribe to yours and Tess' Substacks, is it better to donate to WCH?
Thanks Henry. There are so many causes needing our support. To support the WCH directly both subscribing to Tess's substack and donating directly on the www.worldcouncilforhealth.org web site work equally well. Thanks for helping to fund the fight Henry! It is David verses Goliath.
I'd love to see Dr. Mike Yeadon in these meetings. But of course, they would censor him (which others already have) because he goes beyond (ie. speaks the truth) what all of these people are saying.
As always, with hearfelt gratitude Dr. Trozzi.