Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Gerard Waters's avatar

How can you treat anything without a diagnosis ? Ivermectin used to treat a viral infection based on PCR recycled how many times ?? I as a G P got 100% Covid cure rate doing the same as I did for the previous 40 years of my GP career . Examine the patient on first consultation and treat appropriately never used Ivermectin or other wonder drug. . I don’t disagree with it perhaps having a place in vaccine injury . I don’t know because I was struck from Irish medical register for my refusal to go along with the hoax or administer the mRNA assault.

Expand full comment
steve podhouser's avatar

Make sure to read the story of the decade about Covid that just hit from Dr. Joseph Mercola. It's titled Game Over, and it unravels the truth. Here's part of it:

Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola February 17, 2024

According to U.S. Sen. Rand Paul, author of “Deception: The Great COVID Cover-Up,” the

COVID-19 pandemic, which killed millions of people, was the result of Anthony Fauci’s

decision to fund dangerous gain-of-function research in China

New evidence obtained by U.S. Right to Know (USRTK) further strengthens the theory

that SARS-CoV-2 was made in a lab

The novel features found in SARS-CoV-2 match the research parameters presented in a

2018 grant proposal by EcoHealth Alliance to conduct gain-of-function research on bat

coronaviruses

EcoHealth and the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) were well aware of the potential that

this research could spark a human pandemic. A planning memo contains a note stating,

“We MUST make it clear in proposal that our approach won’t drive evolution the wrong

way, e.g. drive evolution of more virulent strain that then becomes pandemic”

At present, gain-of-function research is allowed provided it’s done with the intention of

creating a vaccine, which is a logical fallacy. We’ve never been able to preemptively

construct a pathogen that later shows up through natural evolution. We’re creating novel

pathogens that don’t exist in nature and then developing vaccines against those. In other

words, we’re creating bioweapons and antidotes to those bioweapons, and this needs to

stop

decision to fund dangerous gain-of-function research in China — research that was

officially banned in the U.S. at the time and at bare minimum should have been done

with U.S. oversight but wasn’t.

Adding insult to injury, Fauci personally profited from the disaster to the tune of about $5

million. “Congress was misled by Anthony Fauci,” Paul told now-independent journalist

Tucker Carlson. “In the end, he deserves to be in prison.”

New Evidence Strongly Indicates SARS-CoV-2 Was Created

In a January 25, 2024, article in the City Journal, science writer, editor and author

Nicholas Wade details new evidence obtained by U.S. Right to Know (USRTK) that

further strengthens the theory that SARS-CoV-2 was indeed made in a lab.

As noted by Wade, that’s the key reason why no one, despite massive testing efforts, has

been able to find SARS-CoV-2 in any wild animal, bats or otherwise. It never existed in

the natural world, only in the lab.

The newly-obtained documents include what amounts to a recipe for “assembling SARStype viruses from six synthetic pieces of DNA designed to be a consensus sequence —

the genetically most infectious form — of viruses related to SARS1, the bat virus that

caused the minor epidemic of 2002,” Wade writes. As it turns out, SARS-CoV-2 has this

exact six-section structure.

The documents also show that “American scientists planned to work with the Wuhan

Institute of Virology to engineer novel coronaviruses with the features of SARS-CoV-2

the year before the virus emerged from that city,” USRTK reporter Emily Kopp writes.

The DEFUSE Proposal Provides the Recipe

In March 2018, the EcoHealth Alliance, led by Peter Daszak, applied for a $14.2 million

grant to conduct gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses in research labs in

1

2

3

4

California, North Carolina, New York, Wisconsin, Singapore and Wuhan. The proposal,

dubbed “Project DEFUSE,” describes how scientists would:

Insert furin cleavage sites at the S1/S2 junction of the spike protein

Assemble synthetic viruses in six segments

Identify coronaviruses that were no more than 25% different from SARS1

Select for receptor binding domains adept at infecting human ACE2 receptors

SARS-CoV-2 Matches DEFUSE Research Parameters

As explained by Kopp, SARS-CoV-2 matches these research parameters to the T. It has

a furin cleavage site in the spike protein at the S1/S2 junction, and its genome can be

divided into six evenly spaced strings of DNA using restriction enzymes called BsaI and

BsmBI. This even spacing is unlikely to occur in the genomes of natural viruses.

The reason scientists splice viruses together using evenly spaced DNA pieces is

because it’s easier to manipulate. It allows them to synthesize the individual pieces

chemically and then string them together to create a complete genome.

This telltale synthetic “fingerprint,” found in the genome of SARS-CoV-2, was detailed in

a 2022 preprint by Bruttel et. al. As noted by Wade, the bottom line is that “if your virus

has evenly spaced recognition sites, it’s a pretty good bet that it was made in a lab.” As it

turns out, the DEFUSE draft proposal even included an order form for BsmBI — a fact

highlighted by Bruttel in a Twitter/X post.

The genomic variations of SARS-CoV-2’s are also within the 25% range indicated in the

proposal, and its receptor binding domains were optimized for human ACE2 receptors

from the start, which is what allowed it to spread like wildfire. Wade writes:

“Discovery of the new recipe certainly strengthens the possibility that the

regular spacing of BsaI and BsmBI recognition sites in SARS2 is the signature

of synthetic origin.

5

6

7 8

9

10

Indeed, Richard H. Ebright, a molecular biologist at Rutgers University who had

called the 2022 paper ‘noteworthy ... but not decisive,’ now says that the

evidence in the new documents ‘elevates the evidence provided by the genome

sequence from the level of noteworthy to the level of a smoking gun.’”

Matt Ridley, coauthor of “Viral: The Search for the Origin of COVID-19” agrees, noting

that all of the novel features of SARS-CoV-2 are explained by the proposed research

methods detailed in the DEFUSE documents.

“Game over.” Ridley wrote. “The latest revelations provide precise confirmation

that all the many suspicious features of SARS-CoV-2 which imply it was man

made were set out in exhaustive detail in the DEFUSE proposal to which Wuhan

Institute of Virology was a partner.”

EcoHealth Was Well Aware of Pandemic Risks

According to the DEFUSE draft USRTK obtained, the plan was to synthesize anywhere

from eight to 16 strains of SARS-type bat viruses with human spillover potential, in order

to create a vaccine that would then be used on bats in regions where there is military

activity.

Importantly, EcoHealth and the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) were well aware of the

potential that this research could spark a human pandemic. A planning memo contains

a note stating, “We MUST make it clear in proposal that our approach won’t drive

evolution the wrong way, e.g. drive evolution of more virulent strain that then becomes

pandemic.”

At present, it would appear that’s exactly what happened. A synthetic virus was

concocted, and somehow escaped from the WIV. Whether it was intentional or not is

another matter. Either way, the moral of the story is that gain-of-function research poses

enormous risks to public health, and if pandemic risk exists, then the research probably

shouldn’t be allowed.

11

12

Documents Show Deceptive Practices to Gain Grants

Another thing these new documents reveal is how Daszak used misdirection in an effort

to deceive the U.S. government about where this obviously risky research would be

conducted. While he had every intention of having much of the work done at the WIV, he

downplayed the role of the Chinese researchers and made it seem as though the

research would be conducted in the U.S.

Expand full comment
52 more comments...

No posts