Rodney Palmer Hosts a Critical Discussion with Medical Martyrs: Dr. Rochagné Kilian, Dr. Zoltan Rona, Prof. Joe Schwarcz, and Constitutional Lawyer Michael Alexander
As Palmer aptly concludes, "If Canadian doctors are being pushed away from an ethical approach to medicine, should Canadians consider pushing away from their doctors?"
This is a very important event, discussion, and closing question! As a scientist (Ph.D.), that has intensively studied the COV debacle (3000+ scientific reports), IMO we are today forced to leave our MD's throughout Canada! Our MD tried to force us to take Paxlovid for COV. One look at the literature on this deadly, useless, expensive poison tells you quite a bit. The major publication (NEJM) that gave it Emergency Authorization falsely claims it cures COV. It is filled with errors and outright lies. The most important deceit says Pfizer has the right to alter results, conclusions, and data, right in their so called publication. The horrid article was written only by Pfizer staff who did all the "research"; total bias, even a high school student would know is anti-science.
I found that Ivermectin cured COV in more than half-million people, yet my MD said he only uses Paxlovid "since Ivermectin does not work". He did not even know it "cured" only about 100 people, most of which got COV back in only a few days! To a person like me, my MD gave me boldfaced lies (perhaps forced by the lying fakes that run all the Colleges of Phys right across Canada), but he was afraid to tell me he could be fired if he prescribed Ivermectin! Additionally, he knew I had heart disease and my wife lung disease, both contraindicated for Paxlovid, yet he still tried to push it on us! I gave him one more chance to prescribe the Ivermectin before dumping him forever and getting our Ivermectin from Dr. Makis!
Thanks Rick. I agree. Doctors across the country were coerced into committing medical assault on each other and their patients, while being silent and thus complicit with the fraud of the covid genetic experiments. A tiny percentage of our nurses, doctors, and scientists like yourself, maintained real science and ethics and withstood severe abuse and losses for doing so. Dr Makis is a great case in point. My family and I are also running away from the many MDs who served as high priests of the covid cult, and have been reduced to high payed slaves of big pharma. We are instead running to the likes of Dr Makis, Dr Shoemaker, Dr Hoffe, Dr Killian etc for help and guidance in achieving health and the absence of disease. It is important for Canadians to realise, that with the current AFA funding of your family doctors, they get payed as long as you are registered with them, regardless of whether they see you or not. So de-registering as a patient with them, is the only way to provide financial feedback for their failures.
The Prof Joe is totally in the dark. He doesn't know what he's talking about. Consensus is not how science is done. He obviously had the shots to keep his job at McGill.
I found his argument to be contradictory, of course; he started by saying that science is evidence but then concluded with science is consensus. No wonder he's in some “science & society” department. 🙄
As Palmer aptly concludes, "If Canadian doctors are being pushed away from an ethical approach to medicine, should Canadians consider pushing away from their doctors?"
This is a very important event, discussion, and closing question! As a scientist (Ph.D.), that has intensively studied the COV debacle (3000+ scientific reports), IMO we are today forced to leave our MD's throughout Canada! Our MD tried to force us to take Paxlovid for COV. One look at the literature on this deadly, useless, expensive poison tells you quite a bit. The major publication (NEJM) that gave it Emergency Authorization falsely claims it cures COV. It is filled with errors and outright lies. The most important deceit says Pfizer has the right to alter results, conclusions, and data, right in their so called publication. The horrid article was written only by Pfizer staff who did all the "research"; total bias, even a high school student would know is anti-science.
I found that Ivermectin cured COV in more than half-million people, yet my MD said he only uses Paxlovid "since Ivermectin does not work". He did not even know it "cured" only about 100 people, most of which got COV back in only a few days! To a person like me, my MD gave me boldfaced lies (perhaps forced by the lying fakes that run all the Colleges of Phys right across Canada), but he was afraid to tell me he could be fired if he prescribed Ivermectin! Additionally, he knew I had heart disease and my wife lung disease, both contraindicated for Paxlovid, yet he still tried to push it on us! I gave him one more chance to prescribe the Ivermectin before dumping him forever and getting our Ivermectin from Dr. Makis!
Thanks Rick. I agree. Doctors across the country were coerced into committing medical assault on each other and their patients, while being silent and thus complicit with the fraud of the covid genetic experiments. A tiny percentage of our nurses, doctors, and scientists like yourself, maintained real science and ethics and withstood severe abuse and losses for doing so. Dr Makis is a great case in point. My family and I are also running away from the many MDs who served as high priests of the covid cult, and have been reduced to high payed slaves of big pharma. We are instead running to the likes of Dr Makis, Dr Shoemaker, Dr Hoffe, Dr Killian etc for help and guidance in achieving health and the absence of disease. It is important for Canadians to realise, that with the current AFA funding of your family doctors, they get payed as long as you are registered with them, regardless of whether they see you or not. So de-registering as a patient with them, is the only way to provide financial feedback for their failures.
The Prof Joe is totally in the dark. He doesn't know what he's talking about. Consensus is not how science is done. He obviously had the shots to keep his job at McGill.
I found his argument to be contradictory, of course; he started by saying that science is evidence but then concluded with science is consensus. No wonder he's in some “science & society” department. 🙄
I did not know that Dr. Rochagné Kilian had to sell their home, which is terrible. My highest regards to all you who stood tall!