Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Deborah Mary Sacco's avatar

Dr. David Martin has recently published his findings about the 1986 Act about adverse events of vaccines. It says that after 500 adverse events they MUST pull the vaccine. Well we are at 10,000 times that number in just adverse events. So this part of the Act of 1986 is being ignored and actually is the solution to sue them for big results and even with criminal implications. The Prosecuters are now starting to listen and set to prosecute. So there is hope for Canadians to do the same. Check out Dr. David Martins latest scoop.

Expand full comment
Rolonne Marie Ross's avatar

In the beginning of the Sh** storm, I 've always wondered what part of "EUA" did people NOT understand? Were we supposed to be the "Crash Test Dummies" while each Province and Territory jettisoned our collective "Emergency Response methods" out the window. That was the First OBVIOUS Red Flag. So many inconsistencies followed that big mistake (Short cut) but people went along for so many reasons that were not truthful. Blinded, frightened, coerced, black-mailed or whatever. More people should have been WAY wiser than this. If everyone said a Collective "NO" ,we would not be facing so much death and destruction of our lives and our way of life.

"LET FREEDOM REIGN"

As far as our Police go, I do NOT paint them all with the same brush and as you did, Dr Trozzi, Former RCMP Danny Bulford said, "NO" as well and got out. He said that he couldn't face his children if he stayed.

Thank GOD for you and Ted.

Safe travels and God be with you all <3 <3 <3

RMRoss

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts