Where Are The Babies? Birth Rate Collapse and Stillbirths After the COVID-19 Vaccine Rollout

World Council for Health calls for an urgent independent investigation into declining birth rates, reproductive health concerns and pregnancy outcomes following the COVID-19 vaccine rollout.

Introduction: The Question No One Wants to Ask

In 2021, something unprecedented began happening around the globe. Approximately 9-10 months after mass COVID-19 vaccination began, birth rates plummeted, not by the usual 1-2% fluctuations that demographers expect, but by 10%, 14%, and even 27%.

Obstetricians and researchers began reporting alarming increases in miscarriages, stillbirths, and fetal abnormalities among vaccinated, pregnant women. When they raised concerns, they were silenced, censored, and labeled “anti-vaxxers”. World Council for Health has been raising the alarm about this issue for years; we already know that mRNA vaccines have been linked to catastrophic ovarian damage.

To understand the origins of these concerns and examine the evidence behind them, we must return to the documents submitted by Pfizer to the FDA during the original vaccine authorisation process.

---

Part One: The Pfizer Documents - What They Tried to Hide for 75 Years

The FOIA Fight

When Pfizer submitted its data to the FDA to support the Emergency Use Authorization, it never expected anyone to see them. In fact, the FDA asked a federal court for 75 years before releasing the thousands of pages of documents.

One interpretation: Pfizer wanted the data hidden for a long time to conceal fraud and criminality. The other: there was only enough staff to complete the task in 75 years. The second explanation is absurd - especially since, after a judge ordered Pfizer to release documents monthly, it found the resources.

Why would Pfizer want to keep the data hidden? Because at the time it went to court, it knew the EUA and the resulting massive global vaccine campaign were pre-determined and independent of whatever “science” emerged. Unfortunately for Pfizer, the science was not supportive. At all.

Pfizer tried to suppress the serious toxicity and lack of efficacy data contained in those documents.

Section 5.3.6: The Pregnancy Data That Shocked the World

Let’s dive into just one page of the thousands: Section 5.3.6, page 12 of the document called “Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports.”

Under the header “Pregnancy cases: 274 cases including ...”

At first read, it’s just a list of adverse events and numbers, but do the simple arithmetic:

270 pregnancies were reported in vaccinated women during the first 12 weeks of the vaccine campaign. In 238 of them, “no outcome was provided”.

So, Pfizer only knew the outcome of 32 pregnancies. What happened in those 32?

• 23 spontaneous abortions

• 2 spontaneous abortions with intra-uterine death

• 2 premature births with neonatal death

• 1 spontaneous abortion with neonatal death

• 1 normal outcome

25 of the 32 pregnancies with known outcomes resulted in miscarriage - a rate of 78%.

Miscarriage normally occurs in only 12-15% of pregnancies.

Adding the premature births with neonatal death and the spontaneous abortion with neonatal death, we get:

32 pregnancies with known outcomes resulted in 28 deaths of the fetus or neonate - 87.5%.

This data was buried. The world was not alerted. This is criminal activity yet again.

---

Part Two: The OB/GYN Whistleblowers - What Doctors Are Seeing

Dr. James A. Thorp, MD - Board Certified in OB/GYN and Maternal-Fetal Medicine, USA

Dr. Thorp has completed a study documenting severe adverse outcomes in women of reproductive age and in pregnancy associated with the COVID-19 jabs, all of these are statistically significant at p values < 0.001.

The US VAERS Danger Signals

The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) pharmacovigilance tool has been flashing significant danger signals since the COVID-19 injection rollout. Despite attempts to delegitimize this federally mandated monitoring system, it is corroborated by over 20 other independent sources.

Proportional reporting ratios (PRR) far exceed the CDC/FDA danger signal of 2:

Dr. Kimberly Biss - St. Petersburg, USA

OB/GYN Dr. Kimberly Biss reported findings from her practice since the COVID vaccine rollout:

• 50% reduction in completed pregnancies

• 50% increase in spontaneous abortions (miscarriages)

• 25% increase in abnormal Pap smears, indicating cervical dysplasia, a precancerous lesion

• 25% increase in cervical cancers

Lisa Mooney - OB/GYN RN, 30 Years Experience, USA

“I can confirm this as I work full time as OB/GYN RN, and have for the past 30 years. Truly heartbreaking the increased level of not only embryonic/fetal loss and infertility BUT also increased morbidity and mortality. My post-partum RN friend is seeing a rise in Rx resistant HTN, preterm births, and very fussy breast-fed infants.”

The Japanese Pfizer Biodistribution Studies

The FOIA request of the Japanese Pfizer biodistribution studies confirmed that within 48 hours the “vaccine” was immediately absorbed into the bloodstream and concentrated in the ovaries 118-fold by 48 hours.

Dr. Thorp testifies:

“This experimental therapy may have permanent damaging effects on the human genome for multiple generations or per perpetuity and makes diethylstilbestrol pale in comparison. It was incumbent upon the stakeholders to have excluded this prior to rolling it out. This is the unforgivable sin.”

Alexandra Latypova - Pharmaceutical Whistleblower, USA

Latypova testified that the industry knowingly and purposely falsified and hid damaging data from the public in their reproductive toxicology studies. She provided internal documents of birth defects of severe rib abnormalities in animals - a condition in humans equivalent to lethal skeletal dysplasia.

“They accepted fraudulent test designs, substitutions of test articles, glaring omissions and whitewashing of serious signs of health damage by the product, then lied to the public on behalf of the manufacturers.”

The NEJM Shimabukuro Article - Burying an 82% Miscarriage Rate

The New England Journal of Medicine published an article titled “Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons” (Shimabukuro Tom T., M.D., Kim Y. Shin, M.P.H. et al.). It pushed the safety of the vaccine in June of 2021 by falsely burying an 82% miscarriage rate - a rate that rivals that of the abortion pill RU486 (mifepristone).

Mifepristone carries a black box warning by the FDA, and yet the stakeholders are pushing this experimental therapy in pregnant women.

The British Government’s Hidden Warning

The British Government advocates against the use of the “vaccine” in pregnancy and breastfeeding mothers and has remained steadfast in this stance. Unfortunately, it underhandedly “buried” this recommendation deep at the end of pages of useless information:

“In the context of supply under Regulation 174, it is considered that sufficient reassurance of safe use of the vaccine in pregnant women cannot be provided at the present time: however, use in women of childbearing potential could be supported provided healthcare professionals are advised to rule out known or suspected pregnancy prior to vaccination.

---

Part Three: The Birth Rate Collapse -The Graphs They Don’t Want You to See

Timing Is Everything

Birth rates vary from year to year and have small peaks and valleys within the year. But you don’t typically see sudden, large decreases from one month to another in numerous countries around the world.

The pattern is unmistakable: approximately 9-10 months after mass vaccination campaigns began, birth rates plummeted.

Stockholm, Sweden - First Quarter 2022

Birth rates plummeted by 14%, shocking Professor Gunnar Andersson, professor of demographics at Stockholm University:

“It is a drastic and remarkable reduction beyond the usual. We have never seen anything like this before, that the bottom just falls out in just one quarter.”

When asked to explain, Professor Andersson said:

“It correlates exactly in time with the mass vaccination program in April, May last year. People understood that the lockdowns ended and now we had to go out in the world again. Demographists in other parts of Europe see the same timing.”

His interpretation: lockdowns ended, vaccines were provided, giving everyone the freedom to start newly re-exploring the world instead of making babies?

This is absurd. Sweden never really had any significant lockdowns.

Sweden: births per million per month changes from year prior

Germany - First Quarter 2022

Germany’s first quarter births compared to previous years show a dramatic decline, also correlating with the vaccination rollout.

Switzerland

Data from the Swiss Policy Research Report shows similar declines.

Hungary- Down 20% Since Vaccine Rollout

This massive decrease was addressed by one member of parliament in a widely circulated video from the RAIR Foundation.

Taiwan - down 27%
UK - down 12-13%
North Dakota - down 12-13%
Norway - down 6.2%

Singapore - Down 23.61% Between 2019 - 2025

The Bujard and Andersson Study (2022)

According to Bujard and Andersson in Stockholm Research Reports in Demography (2022):

“There is no association of the fertility trends [in Germany or Sweden] with changes in unemployment, infection rates, or COVID-19 deaths. However, there is a strong association between the onset of vaccination programmes and the fertility decline nine months after this onset. The fertility decline in the first months of 2022 in Germany and Sweden is remarkable. Common explanations for fertility change during the pandemic do not apply in its aftermath.”

The Pattern Is Global

These are not isolated incidents. From Europe to Asia to North America, the pattern repeats:

• Large drops

• Occurring approximately nine months after vaccination campaigns began

• In countries with vastly different lockdown policies, unemployment rates, and COVID death rates

• With no other common explanatory factor

---

Part Four: The Menstrual Irregularities - What Women Were Never Told

The Facebook Groups That Were Shut Down

Although censored, many in my network were aware of massive Facebook groups of women reporting and discussing severe menstrual irregularities as a result of these “vaccines”. These groups were shut down by Facebook.

Remember, the vaccination campaign had only one enemy: “vaccine hesitancy”. The federal government paid $1 billion to media companies to support a favorable view of the vaccines. Massive groups of women reporting severe menstrual irregularities would drive vaccine hesitancy, so such talk had to be suppressed.

The University of Illinois Study

Researchers at the University of Illinois were trying to survey 5,000 women to study the effects on menstruation. They were besieged with over 30,000 responses in a day or two. The results were disturbing - and were either explained away as temporary or just ignored.

The Suppression by Medical Organizations

Never forget the inaction, ignoring, and suppression of these data by:

• The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG)

• The Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA)

• The American Neurological Association

• The American Heart Association

• The Deans of the nation’s 126 Academic Medical Centers

There is an endless list of leaders in academic medicine who either were cowardly or willfully complicit in the suppression and ignoring of these data.

---

Part Five: The Regulatory Standard That Was Ignored

The Long-Standing Principle

When a new medicine or device is introduced, you must first assume any adverse effects or deaths reported to be related to the intervention until proven otherwise.

This is the now-ignored but long-standing regulatory standard.

What We Must Do

We must assume the vaccines are impacting fertility unless some other provable or credible explanation for a sudden drop in month-to-month birth rates can be provided.

So stop the shots until you can prove they are not - this would be the 189th reason to stop the shots.

World Council for Health called for an immediate stop to the Covid-19 experimental “vaccines” in 2021.

https://www.worldcouncilforhealth.org/covid-19-vaccines/

---

Part Six: The Historical Context - Big Pharma’s Decades of Criminality

$30 Billion in Fines Since 2000

The pharmaceutical industry has committed crimes for decades, paying $30 billion in civil and criminal fines since 2000.

The False Claims Act

“While the defense industry used to be the biggest defrauder of the federal government under the False Claims Act (FCA), a law enacted in 1863 to prevent defense contractor fraud, the pharmaceutical industry has greatly overtaken the defense industry in recent years. The pharmaceutical industry now tops not only the defense industry, but all other industries in the total amount of fraud payments for actions taken against the federal government under the False Claims Act.”

The Playbook

They have done this with numerous newly launched medications:

• Avandia

• Bextra

• Vioxx

• Oxycodone

Many hundreds of thousands of deaths have resulted from the burying of adverse events and death data around newly launched products - until they are caught, pay massive fines, and then carry on doing the same thing.

The Swine Flu Precedent

The Swine Flu vaccine in 1976 was immediately removed from the market for 26 deaths.

The COVID-19 vaccines are documented as causing 1,223 deaths in 90 days (December 1, 2020 to February 28, 2021) in the Pfizer documents alone. By all historical standards, they should have been immediately removed from the market in December 2020.

---

Part Seven: Naomi Wolf and the WarRoom/DailyClout Research Volunteers

The Truth

In May 2022, Dr. Naomi Wolf and the WarRoom/DailyClout Research Volunteers broke the story of another section of the Pfizer documents. In this, the mortality rate of fetuses and babies of women vaccinated with Pfizer’s mRNA injection was about 80%.

Why Do Approval Studies Care So Much About Women and Fertility?

This is a question that demands an answer.

Approval studies know. They know the reproductive toxicity. They know the biodistribution to the ovaries. They know the risks.

And yet the vaccine was pushed on pregnant women anyway, who were told it was “safe and effective” despite the fact that the trials did not include pregnant women.

Conclusion: Stop the Vaccines, Now

This is a humanitarian catastrophe heaped atop the one caused by dangerous gain-of-function research.

Stop the gene therapy mRNA injections, now and launch an urgent independent investigation into population collapse from Europe to Asia to North America.

We owe our children and grandchildren an honest, transparent investigation into declining birth rates, reproductive health and potential contributing factors. Protecting future generations must be our highest priority.

---

Appendix: Key Sources and Further Reading

Peer-Reviewed Publications

1. Thorp J.A. et al., “COVID-19 and Disaster Capitalism—Part I, II, and III”, The Gazette of Medical Sciences, July 27, 2022; Jan 16, 2023; March 2023

2. Yamamoto K. “COVID-19 vaccine booster shots may be harmful to the immune system.” Virology Journal, June 5, 2022.

3. Bujard M, Andersson G. “Fertility decline in Germany and Sweden after COVID-19 vaccination rollout.” Stockholm Research Reports in Demography, 2022.

Pfizer Documents

• Section 5.3.6: “Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports”

• Available at: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf

Independent Monitoring Systems

• VAERS (US)

• UK Yellow Card

• European Medicines Agency EudraVigilance

• WHO VigiAccess

• World Council for Health

• Military DMED database

Key Researchers and Whistleblowers

• Dr. Pierre Kory, MD, MPA

• Dr. James A. Thorp, MD

• Dr. Kimberly Biss, OB/GYN

• Dr. Naomi Wolf

• Alexandra Latypova

• Peter Imanuelson (Freedom Corner with Peter Sweden)

• Steve Kirsch

• Dr. Peter McCullough

Addendum

https://wchweb.b-cdn.net/Multimedia/Addendum_Babies.pdf

---

Please help support our work!

If you find value in this Substack and have the means, please consider making a donation to support the World Council for Health. Thank you.

---

---

This article is not intended to be used in place of individual medical advice. It cannot be used to diagnose illness or access treatment. Individuals may use the materials provided by World Council for Health to complement the care provided by their qualified, trusted health professionals. All information provided by World Council for Health or in connection with its website is offered to promote consideration by individuals and their trained healthcare providers of various evidence-based prevention and treatment options. The information on this website is for general informational purposes and is not a substitute for medical advice. Errors and omissions may occur.

Please email info@worldcouncilforhealth.org if you would like to get in touch.