Exit the WHO: A Historic Leap Towards Health Sovereignty
Nations Must Choose: Health Freedom or Global Control. Discussion with Dr Tess Lawrie, Christof Plothe DO, Shabnam Palesa Mohamed, and Dr Mark Trozzi
The World Council for Health Leads the Way
The World Council for Health (WCH) has emerged as a beacon of integrity in global health. Unlike the World Health Organization (WHO), WCH operates free from corporate influence, uniting over 230 organizations across 55 countries to empower individuals and restore true medical ethics. With the recent announcement of the United States withdrawing from the WHO, the question arises: should all nations follow suit?
Follow and Support the World Council for Health for more empowering information.
Why the WHO No Longer Serves Humanity
For decades, the WHO was perceived as a benevolent institution dedicated to public health. However, its recent history reveals a disturbing transformation. It has become a vehicle for pharmaceutical interests, driven by entities like the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. This shift led to policies that prioritized corporate profits over human health, as seen during the COVID-19 crisis.
During the pandemic, the WHO failed to uphold evidence-based medicine. Instead, it pushed harmful lockdowns, unproven "vaccine" mandates, and fear-based narratives while dismissing lifesaving treatments such as ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. Investigations have also exposed corruption, conflicts of interest, and financial mismanagement within the WHO, further justifying calls for national withdrawal.
The Devastating Impact of WHO Policies
The WHO’s policies have left a lasting mark on global health:
Lockdowns and Social Distancing: Enforced under WHO guidance, these policies devastated economies, increased poverty, and caused irreparable harm to children’s education and mental health.
Coerced Medical Interventions: Many were forced into taking experimental "vaccines," which have since been linked to autoimmune disorders, heart complications, and increased mortality.
Public Health Cover-Ups: The WHO remained silent on dangerous corporate practices, including Pfizer’s coercive contracts with governments and questionable medical experiments in Africa.
Suppression of Alternative Medicine: From natural immunity to traditional medicine, the WHO actively discredited effective treatments while pushing for an aggressive pharmaceutical agenda.
What Happens When Countries Exit the WHO?
A nation’s decision to leave the WHO is a statement of sovereignty. It signals the end of outsourcing health decisions to unelected bureaucrats and globalist think tanks. Here’s what withdrawal can achieve:
Redirecting Funds to National Healthcare – Instead of paying millions in WHO membership fees, funds can be reinvested in hospitals, research, and genuine health initiatives.
Independent Health Policies – Countries can establish medical guidelines based on science, ethics, and individual needs rather than corporate-driven WHO mandates.
Ending Globalist Control Over Public Health – Freed from the WHO’s influence, governments can prevent future forced medical interventions and propaganda-driven health scares.
A New Era of Decentralized Health – International cooperation can continue through transparent, ethical networks like the WCH, which prioritize human well-being over profits.
The Road to Withdrawal: How Nations Can Reclaim Health Sovereignty
Withdrawal from the WHO requires political will and grassroots advocacy. Governments must:
Recognize the WHO’s failure to fulfill its constitutional objective of providing the highest attainable level of health.
Defund the organization immediately to stop financing corruption and coercion.
Establish independent health bodies that promote ethical medical practices, informed consent, and individual freedom.
A New Paradigm in Global Health
The collapse of trust in the WHO marks a turning point. The future belongs to decentralized, ethical healthcare systems that empower individuals rather than dictate to them. Countries worldwide must now ask themselves: do we serve globalist interests, or do we reclaim our right to health sovereignty?
As the movement to exit the WHO gains momentum, one thing is clear—this is not just about policy. It is about reclaiming our freedom, dignity, and health for generations to come.
In Canada there's no official party willing to upset the apple cart for health freedom. Exiting the WHO is not on the table, even though the US is going that way. Canadians appear to be mostly unaware of the globalist domination planned by these pandemic perpetrators. They've been lied to and gaslit and the majority got stabbed with something terrible that they'd rather not think about. If they knew the truth there would be outrage I'm sure, and possibility for change, but the captured media, dysfunctional government, and foreign and corporate interests have all but brainwashed the masses except for a minority of critical thinkers like you and your followers.
However, there's hope for us as the truth is being uncovered around the world and is slowly filtering down to alternative media despite the censorship. Eventually it'll be too difficult to deny I think, and the tide will turn. Once seen, this horrific crime can't be forgotten and dismissed.
We can only dream that Canada would exit that organization as well but I don't hold much hope. However, didn't Argentina also say they are pulling out of the WHO? As lonedery2 says, there is not enough political will in Canada to withdraw, only the opposite.